Clearing all the things in my notebook for the modules that I took last year~~
For General Education 1: Critical Reasoning & Argumentation,
For General Education 1: Critical Reasoning & Argumentation,
- Learning outcomes: Perspective, Expression and Engagement
- 3 Key Aims: To Evaluate the Basic Elements of an Argument and Build Strong Arguments (Skill Set), Think Critically (Mental Set)
- An Argument includes ISSUE^ (Questions), then CLAIM* (Yes or No), then REASON using Appeals, Evidence and Assumption.
^What's an Issue?
- It is a Question that suggests 2 opposing response. Eg. Yes or No
- And is best stated with such words as 'should', 'will', 'does'
- Examples of Issues:
> Should Polytechnic start lessons at 10am?
*Making a Claim (Thesis Statement): To take a Stand or Position
For General Education 2: Critical Reasoning & Persuasion,
- Topic > Claim > Evidences (Authority, Examples, Statistics) > Appeals (Emotional, Ethical, Logical Appeals) > Assumptions
- For EVIDENCES,
- Authority
- Trust experts in a given field to be reliable and trustworthy
- Testimonies are taken to be impartial and objective. Eg. Use a doctor for Health issues
- (+) Provide Knowledge, Reliable
- (-) Experts make mistakes as well, Vested Interest, Deceit
- Examples
- A GOOD Example: Clarifies the reality behind the issue and is Persuasive
- A BAD Example: Too ideal and extreme, Do not represent the entirety of a idea or an argument, May be too emotionally charged
- Statistics
- Numerical Facts, Require Interpretation
- (+) Objective, Representative of Actual Situation & Provides a powerful analysis of understanding of an issue
- (-) Information may be manipulated to be misleading
- For APPEALS, (Use words to invoke more emotions)
- Emotional Appeals - Pathos: Motivational Appeals, Use of emotions
- Ethical Appeals - Ethos: Source Credibility & Trustworthy, Use of Authority
- Logical Appeals - Logos: The logic used to support a claim, Use of Facts and Statistics
- An Example of a topic would be "Should Children below the Age of 12 be banned from Social Media sites?" Then use emotional, Ethical and Logical Appeals.
- For ASSUMPTIONS,
- Beliefs that are taken for granted
- Operate at the subconscious or unconscious level of thought process
- (+) Useful if we are unable to obtain information and facts
- Avoid UNNECESSARY Assumptions:
- By asking questions when delivering the presentation
- Check knowledge, Inference, Hypotheses, Feelings, Culture and Background
- Trace the Origin and Sources
- GE2 PRESENTATION FORMAT
- Topic
- State Stand / Claim
- Give Reason (1) and support with Evidence (Example, Authority, Statistics). If possible, Quote the source. Use Appeals (Logos, Pathos, Ethos)
- Give Reason (2) and support with Evidence and Appeals as well.
- End with summarising the points said.
For Communicating through Project Effectiveness (Report),
- 4 AIMS
- Present Ideas in a Formal Presentation
- Give and Receive Feedback
- Write a Report for an intended audience
- Apply Conflict Management Strategies
- PAC: Purpose, Audience and Context. An example would be:
- P > To raise Funds for the financially and socially needs
- A > School Students, Needy Families in one room flat
- C > Sell Food during Flag Day Event or organise a Sport Carnival Event
- For Reference and Citation, "YouTube: A Guide to Harvard Referencing" is a good video.
- 1.51s (You only put the surnames e.g. Cohen, 2011)
- If direct copy, Eg. Cohen, 2011, Page Number
- 4.00s (Referencing a Book)
- Author's Surname, Year, Title, Place and Author's Organisation
- E.g. Chan M., 2014. The Watch and The Dog, Singapore: Penguin
- 4.13s (Referencing an E-Book)
- 4.38s (Referencing an On-line Journal) > Must bracket (Article)
- (Referencing an On-line Video) > Must bracket (On-line Video)
- When Referencing a Website,
- **Author / Publishing Organisation, Year Published, Internet Site Title [Online], URL, [Accessed on what date]
- E.g. Palgrave Macmillian, 2011. Skills4Study [Online] Available from: http://www.skills4study.com (Accessed on 20 July 2013)
- 8 Common Fallacies
- Slippery Slope
- Wrongly thought of unlikely consequences
- Red Herring
- Distract someone from the argument
- Non Sequitur
- An argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises
- We think A cause B. But, there is no cause between them. Wrongly Thought Causes.
- E.g. Elected as Chairman because she is Pretty (X wrong). Actually, it is because she has leadership skills.
- Post Hoc
- After the event has happen, then a cause / incident happens
- Bandwagon
- Jump on the Bandwagon means If everyone does it, its acceptable.This is a wrong thinking.
- E.g. So if everyone smokes, its acceptable? No, as it harms our health and pollutes the enviroment
- Ad Hominem
- Do not look at the arguments or points, Attack a person's character
- False Authority
- Fake Experts
- Hasty Generalisation
- Cannot Over-Generalise
- E.g. Cannot say ALL Singaporeans are like this. But should say Most, Some, Few
- TIPS ON EDITING & PROOF READING #1 (REPORT)
- C4: Clear, Concise, Complete, Correct
- Check the Languages Aspects in the report.
- CONTENT:
- Have you done eveything the assignment requires?
- Is the level of details and information sufficient?
- OVERALL STRUCTURE:
- Do the sections fit the requirement of the report?
- Are the section headings and subheadings suitably named?
- STRUCTURE WITHIN PARAGRAPH:
- Does each paragraph have a clear topic sentence?
- Does each paragraph stick to one idea?
- CLARITY:
- Define any important terms that is unclear to the readers?